A new academic year is about to start in many
schools and colleges in our country. The admission process is gearing up and the
strength of students joining the courses of their like is also on the raise.
Happy that many are continuing their education and that too of their choice and
planning to make a great career in the days ahead. Which is the best way to impart knowledge to the students?
At a later period pupils were encouraged to
learn in the hope of some kind of reward. This often took the form of marks awarded
daily or weekly for work done, and some times of prizes given at the end of
each year to the best scholars. Such a system appealed to the competitive spirit, but it often had just has
depressing an effect as the older system of punishment on the slow but willing
pupil.
The two systems suggest that teachers felt
that their pupils had to be either compelled or bribed to learn. In the nineteenth
century, however, there sprang up a different type of teacher, passionately
convinced that learning was worthwhile for its own sake, and that the young
learner’s principal stimulus should be neither anxiety to avoid a penalty nor
ambition to win a reward, but sheer desire to learn.
These teachers used their best endeavours to render the process of learning pleasant and where this was not possible, to show that hard plodding would yield results of practical value to the learner. Interest, direct or indirect, became the keyword of instruction, and so it has remained.
The earliest methods, however, tough now
practiced less frequently have not been completely abandoned. If you walk into
a modern classroom that contains all the most up –to – date equipment, you may observe
a highly trained teacher inspiring boys and girls with his own enthusiasm for
his subject. Yet you will probably find that he awards marks for the work done
by his pupils, and you will certainly find that the careless or inattentive pupil
is liable to be punished.
No comments:
Post a Comment